Thursday, December 15, 2016

I Graduated From A "Top 25 Music School"!

Going back to school is always on the mind of someone who may feel trapped or confused as to where their life is going. Almost three years ago today, I was in this position. Like most young adults fresh out of high school, I began working in retail. I had no idea what I wanted to do with my life. After five years of doing nothing but working, I was very unhappy. I knew I needed a change.

I began to reflect back to my high school years and thought why at that time my life felt so blissful. Of course, paying bills came to my mind first; as that was a huge luxury every kid has when they live with their parents. But then I thought of music! Music was what got me through every day. I loved listening to my iPod every morning on my way to school, playing the piano at every chance I could, and being a part of my school’s amazingly talented choir. Music is what gave my life that bright beam of light, and I would give anything to get it back.

The next day without any more hesitation, I went to my computer and began my Google search for music schools. That’s when I was first introduced to Full Sail University. It actually was one of the first search results that I was given. Following the link to their website, I fell in love with this University. The pictures of the campus were breathtaking, and the programs offered were exactly what I was looking for. At that moment, a feeling of warmth and happiness had come over me that I hadn’t felt in a very long time. My life had a purpose again; I knew that I needed to attend this school.

It turns out that the University I chose was one of the best in the country. For the consecutive fourth year in a row, The Hollywood Reporter has featured Full Sail University in their “Top 25 Music Schools” list (THR Staff, 2016). The article also mentions the notable Alumni: Grammy Award-winning producer Sebastian Krys, and Academy Award-winning sound mixer Gary Rizzo. This list of schools includes many of the most prestigious music schools in the US: Yale School of Music, Berklee College of Music, The Julliard School, and more (THR Staff, 2016).

At this point, I gotta admit, that after two months of graduation, I still am unemployed. However, I continue to hold my head high and apply, apply, apply. I know my career is still out there yet, especially after hearing great news like this.

So for every college grad out there still looking to jump-start your career, don’t give up! Stay positive, and keep envisioning your great success to come.

References

THR Staff. (2016, November 23). USC - The Top 25 Music Schools 2016. Retrieved December 15, 2016, from http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lists/top-25-music-schools-2016-949274/item/usc-25-music-schools-2016-949278 

Wednesday, May 18, 2016

"The Controlled Composition Clause": The Devil in disguise

Let's talk about “the controlled composition clause” commonly found in recording contracts. This clause deals with “actual” musicians: composers, and singer/songwriters. There are artists who are just singers and not necessarily involved in the writing process, thus, this clause may be irrelevant, but would most likely still be present in their agreement. Here is what “the controlled composition clause” looks like:
“…Record Company is hereby granted a mechanical license for all Controlled Compositions, as defined below, embodied in the Masters at fifty (50%) percent of the minimum statutory mechanical copyright royalty rate in effect on the date of the first release of Records containing such Controlled Compositions (the “Controlled Rate”). The term “Controlled Composition” means a Composition embodied in any Master delivered hereunder which is written or composed by Owner, alone or in part, directly or indirectly, by Owner, or by any person, corporation, partnership, firm, or other entity in which Owner has a direct or indirect interest…” (Schornstein, 2006).
The purpose of this clause is to divide the Mechanical royalties, in which a musician would make from their music under US copyright law, between them and the record company. Clearly, this clause benefits the record company, and not the artist whatsoever. The artist instead of receiving 100% of the US statutory rate, is given a discounted rate, in this case, 50%. It is common, however, for record companies to give 75%, rather than 50.
It’s easy to see why record companies would include this clause as there is such a drop in music sales. This along with many other clauses opens up another revenue stream. As a singer/songwriter, you are cutting out the “middleman”, so naturally the record company feels entitled to a portion of that “extra income” you will be bringing in.
Getting a discounted Mechanical royalty rate is not the only downside to this clause, though. The other negative is that this rate will not increase even though the actual US Statutory rate has increased by the time of sale. The rate the artist receives is pinned at the rate established on the date of the first release of the record. It would be very wise to have your lawyer negotiate this to the date of manufacture of the record, rather than the release (Schornstein, 2006).
Although it does not include this in the example I provided, some agreements also have a cap on the amount of songs Mechanical royalties will be paid. They may limit it to 10 songs even though the artist wrote all 15 songs on the album (FreeAdviseLegal.com).
Concluding my thoughts here, I find this clause to be completely unreasonable and should be revised. My biggest reason for this: What resources of the record company’s are a musician using when they create THEIR music? The company is not providing the artist with composers or lyric writers at any point in time. So… I’m really confused as to why a record company would think money is to be split from the actual creative aspect that went into the creation of these songs. Now the producer I believe does deserve a portion of Mechanical royalties, as he/she helped record and mix the actual sound recording of the song(s). If and ONLY if the record company sets an artist up with one of their producers, then this clause makes sense. However, the percentage taken by the record company should be no more than 15%, and even that is being more than generous. The bottom line is the artists are already being paid very little, as the record companies have so many expenses to take out. All of which is understandable, but needs to be within reason. It’s completely unreasonable to charge an expense in which the record company’s resources of any kind were not used.
References
FreeAdviceLegal.com. (n.d.). Recording agreement points. Retrieved May 18, 2016, fromhttp://law.freeadvice.com/intellectual_property/music_law/recording_agreement.htm
Schornstein, J. M. (2006). Recording contract clauses. Retrieved May 18, 2016, fromhttp://www.musiciansintellectuallaw.com/rec_clauses.html




  

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Zoe Keating

Image by: Jerry Dodrill
This talented woman is a cellist creating music of the classical genre. She lives in the redwood forest about an hour and half out of San Francisco, California (Castro, 2011). Her music is hauntingly beautiful and full of emotion. She creates her music digitally via her computer using only one instrument, her cello. Layers and layers of musical phrases played from her cello create her songs. She loves what she does, and loves that she can share her art with the world.
Her music is available to purchase and/or listen to on a number of websites and programs such as iTunes, Amazon, YouTube, Spotify, etc. She is very famous for publicly announcing her income from each of these sources. Keating made a total earning of $75,341 from her music sales in 2013 (Dredge, 2014). In addition, the article also states that she made an additional $6,380 from music streaming services. The article further goes on to break down her earned income from the different sources. I won’t mention all the details, but her biggest source of income came from iTunes, bringing in $38,195, which is made up from 3,862 albums, and 32,170 single tracks (Dredge, 2014).
On her website (Click Here) she has her album for sale along with some merchandise. To purchase her album digitally her price is $6. She has a deluxe edition CD digipak for $12, which includes the CD, a photo booklet, liner notes, 4 bonus tracks, and finally the digital download of all 15-tracks. She also has the regular CD digipak for $9. This one includes the CD, along with the digital download of all 11-tracks. Lastly, she has the Zoe Tee for $18. This shirt is available for men and women in all sizes.
Concluding my thoughts here, I think this independent artist is very successful. She is proving to me that an artist can make an honest living on their music without the aid of a big record label. Just as Kelly (2008) states, it only takes 1,000 true fans to build a successful career in entertainment. She obviously has a dedicated fan base. Her bundles are great, and I was pleasantly surprised that they were offered. I do wonder if she will create more merchandise, and how much she is currently making from her t-shirts alone. All in all, I’m happy I now know of Zoe Keating. I hope her career grows as she continues to do what she does best.
References
Castro, M. (2011, September 6). Zoe Keating: A Symphony Unto Herself. NPR. Retrieved January 20, 2016, from http://www.npr.org/2011/09/06/140069246/zoe-keating-a-symphony-unto-herself
Dredge, S. (2014, February 24). Musician Zoe Keating reveals iTunes, Spotify and YouTube payouts for 2013. The Guardian. Retrieved January 20, 2016, fromhttp://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/24/zoe-keating-itunes-spotify-youtube-payouts
Into The Trees, by Zoe Keating. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2016, from http://music.zoekeating.com/
Kelly, K. (2008, March 4). The Technium: 1,000 True Fans. Retrieved January 20, 2016, fromhttp://kk.org/thetechnium/1000-true-fans/

Wednesday, January 6, 2016

A Great Big World: "Is There Anybody Out There?"


I loved this album cover the minute I saw it on iTunes. The cover is very mysterious and a beautiful midnight shade of blue. It’s a picture of a starry night sky. The moon is glowing and is enormous. You can see a tree centered on the ground below with a little girl sitting on the very top branch gazing into the stars. The band’s name is written in giant letters in the sky. The “O” in the word “world” is perfectly displayed by the yellow moon. The album title is written in smaller writing and placed in the bottom right-hand corner. Not to forget, the rocket ship headed to space that is placed in the “A” representing the negative space of the letter. Together it all forms a stunning piece of musical art.

This artwork effectively represents the band, as the music in this album is very mysterious and lyrical. A lot of the songs are piano based, and have strong messages conveyed in their lyrics. Their hit single “Say Something” featuring Christina Aguilera sounds very haunting and alluring. The cover art shows a vast world of interest and meaning. It also shows wonder and excitement. This is the bands very first album release, so not only is the picture a perfect beginning to their career, but also so is the album title. Asking consumers is there anybody out there is pretty cleaver. They are asking the world to listen up. This duo is made up of two guys named Ian Axel and Chad Vaccarino. After the success of their single with Christina Aguilera, the two decided to release the full album. Their name A Great Big World fits them very well as Axel stated, “…everything’s kind of bigger than us” – referring to their newly found fame and success - (Knopper, 2013, Para. 6).  

The album had mixed reviews. The New York Times seemed to have nothing good to say about it. However, Newsday’s Glenn Gamboa called the album “eclectic both musically and lyrically” (Jaeger, 2014, Para. 7). He also stated how heartfelt and jubilant the songs were. Fans of singer/songwriters, which is A Great Big World’s target market in my opinion, are intrigued by beauty and music/art with deep meaning. So the cover art for this album appealed perfectly to their target audience.

References

Jaeger, K. (2014, January 21). A Great Big World's 'Is There Anybody Out
There?': What the critics are saying. The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved January 6, 2016, from http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/a-great-big-worlds-is-672857

Knopper, S. (2013, December 18). Meet A Great Big World, the New
York duo behind 'Say Something'. RollingStone. Retrieved January 6, 2016, from http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/meet-a-great-big-world-the-new-york-duo-behind-say-something-20131218